One of the conclusions to be
drawn from an agreement among historians is that the earliest architecture were
direct referrals to religion and politics of the time. Be that as it may, in
this present context reliance on both these aspects eventually became ossified
and anachronistic. Architects in the late nineteenth century too found that
neither do the cultural nor conventional social values were any longer a
challenge. Hence they quite spontaneously looked to emergent areas of
expression – the new technologies and materials.
In the meantime, restless
industrial revolution in the West opened up a market of newly discovered
materials namely iron, steel and glass. Invention of new building techniques
came almost naturally. And of course this subsequently
steered architecture into new plausible forms never imagined credible. Architects
have ever since strived to exploit technology hoping to fabricate their very
own brand of modern marvels. The intention is however not hard to find.
Throughout history, fame has been the architects’ lifeblood and
motivation to build ever more ambitious schemes (Wiley, 2001). A ticket to
world recognition just seems like an offer too good to turn down. Together with
building materials of the 21st century, architects have not cease to litter
cities with individualistic approach. Apart from the lack of uniform effort,
their buildings are in many instances having no cultural reference whatsoever.
Not until recently, concerns with
interest to green issues by responsible authorities were put into action. Melting
glaciers, climate changes and thinning of ozone are some global changes already
under way. Undoubtedly when it comes to environmental havoc, the building
sector devoted the most. Nonetheless, it is most unfortunate that only a
handful acknowledge the impact of modern building materials.
Dazzled by the dynamic and interesting
new architecture, the public forgets to question their propriety with the
circumstances of our planet, or even the nation. Hence we have reached the
ironic position of having what may well be the most inventive and exciting
discoveries, with surely the most ridiculous setbacks. Apparently for Malaysia
to have her own architectural identity still generates an impression of a
distant dream. From the materials to the shape, our architecture are nothing
but direct adaptation of Western prototypes. This pursual for identity, in a
strange way, implies that the nation has either lost its identity or doesn't savvy
who one is. Equally bad, the extensive use of air conditioner and low
dependence on renewable energy suggest low public awareness on environmental affairs.
The thought of using climate friendly materials was surgically removed from our
memories.
Not only do we need to come up
with measures to handle the tropical heat, but also a national symbol. Perhaps
the question was already answered. Generations before us had ingeniously uncovered
these means without the cutting edge technology we presently have, they only need
to be rediscovered.
Dense, enduring, and locally
available, bamboo is a familiar material in Malaysian history. Facing no
problems coping with the weather, its distinctive properties open up to newfangled
potential in architecture design. Within realm of
possibility, this could mean the prelude of our modern vernacular built forms.
________________________________________________________________
Green School, Bali
WnW Cafe and Bar, Vietnam
Simon Velez's Projects
No comments:
Post a Comment